For years, our understanding of air quality has revolved around broad categories of particulate matter (PM): coarse particles (PM10), fine particles (PM2.5), and ultrafine particles (PM0.1). However, within this framework lies a critical oversight — the 0.3-micron gap. This largely unrecognized size range is at the heart of three major blind spots affecting air quality monitoring, airborne disease transmission, and climate adaptation in today’s world.
The Overlooked Tiny Particles with Big Consequences
Traditional air quality metrics assume that PM2.5 primarily consists of particles between 1 and 2.5 microns, but real-world measurements tell a different story. In indoor environments, the actual size distribution of airborne particles skews heavily toward much smaller sizes — often below 0.3 microns.
Yet, despite their predominance, these tiny particles remain largely undetected by commercial air quality sensors and are inadequately filtered by most HVAC systems. This would be of little concern if this gap didn’t have real-world consequences, especially as we contend with the twin threats of airborne infectious diseases and worsening wildfire smoke exposure.
The Relevance of <0.3 Micron Particles for Pathogen Transmission
Recent studies have demonstrated that infectious aerosols exist in a broad range of particle sizes, including concentrations below 0.3 microns. Pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and other respiratory viruses have been detected in these super fine particles, which can remain suspended in the air for extended periods, increasing the risks of airborne transmission. Unlike larger droplets that settle quickly, these tiny particles can be inhaled deeply into the respiratory system, reaching the alveoli where they may cause infection.
Simultaneously, scientific studies have shown that exhaled breath aerosols contain multimodal particle distributions, with a significant fraction in the 0.08–0.3 micron range. These particles can carry viable viruses and are small enough to evade gravitational settling, increasing the potential for long-range airborne transmission. Research has also detected substantial amounts of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, for example, in particles smaller than 0.3 microns, reinforcing the concern that current air filtration and sensor technologies may be missing a critical vector of disease spread. The failure to account for these particle sizes in air quality monitoring and filtration leaves schools, hospitals, and workplaces vulnerable to outbreaks of airborne diseases.
The Relevance of <0.3 Micron Particles for Wildfire Smoke
Wildfire smoke is one of the most pervasive sources of sub-0.3 micron particles, capable of traveling thousands of miles and infiltrating indoor spaces. These super fine particles pose significant health risks, as they can penetrate deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream, causing inflammations, and exacerbating respiratory and cardiovascular conditions. Meanwhile, standard air quality sensors are simply blind to particles in this size range, leading to potential underestimation of indoor smoke exposure. Additionally, conventional air filters, including many used in HVAC systems, struggle to capture these particles effectively, leaving indoor environments vulnerable to smoke infiltration during wildfire events.
Blind Spot #1: Measurement Limitations
Due to the physical limitations of the baseline technology, most commercial air quality sensors and even industrial PM detectors cannot “see” particles smaller than 0.3 microns. These limitations unfortunately cannot be easily overcome by data, AI, or software. This means that despite their widespread use, these sensors could be providing a misleading picture of indoor air quality. During one of our recent school-based air quality studies, high-resolution scientific instruments detected a dominance of sub-0.3 micron particles in the presence of students and staff. In the meantime, commercial sensors reported “healthy” air (consistent PM2.5 <5 µg/m3), unable to account for implications of occupancy concentration and risks of superfine particles.
This oversight has implications: when sensors fail to represent highly relevant particles for airborne disease transmission or pollution exposure, researchers and decision-makers are left with incomplete data that could lead to incorrect conclusions. The result? A false sense of security about indoor air quality.
Blind Spot #2: Filtration Efficiency at Its Weakest
Air filters used in commercial buildings, including schools and hospitals, are least effective at capturing particles in the 0.1–0.3 micron range. This size range happens to be where some of the most concerning airborne threats — such as viruses and wildfire smoke — are concentrated.
Most HVAC systems rely on MERV-rated filters, which are tested for their ability to capture particles 0.3 microns and larger. However, this means there is no standard measure of how well these filters capture smaller particles. Even widely recommended MERV 13 filters may not be sufficient for mitigating the associated risks. Without better filtration technology, many buildings remain vulnerable to poor air quality.
Blind Spot #3: The Testing Gap for Super Fine, Organic Aerosols
While air filters are tested per standards using inorganic particles such as salt aerosols with sizes >0.3 µm, real-world pollutants have very different composition and size distribution. Wildfire smoke, for example, is composed of over 90% organic matter, which behaves differently from inorganic salts. In turn, they can quickly degrade filter performance. This means that even filters that perform well in standardized tests may be significantly less effective when exposed to actual environmental conditions. Without updated testing protocols that better reflect these real-world challenges, our current filters may be offering far less protection than presumed.
Why This Matters More Than Ever
As airborne diseases continue to challenge public health and wildfires become more frequent, these overlooked particles pose an increasing threat. Even in schools, hospitals, and workplaces that have air quality sensors and advanced filtration systems, these technologies may not be providing the level of protection people assume and need. To bridge this gap, we should be demanding:
- Better Air Quality Sensors: Commercial sensors must be improved to detect sub-0.3 micron particles, ensuring that public health and facility management decisions are based on more representative data.
- Stronger Filtration Standards: MERV ratings should include efficiency metrics for particles below 0.3 microns and consider real-world organic aerosols.
- More Research & Revised Public Health Guidelines: More research is necessary to address gaps in understanding the 0.1–0.3 micron particle size range and their associated health risks. This consideration should also be included by researchers and standard makers, and regulators.
The Path Forward
The 0.3-micron blind spot represents a critical gap in our approach to air quality, health, and climate adaptation. Without addressing it, we risk underestimating exposure to harmful airborne pollutants and pathogens, leaving communities vulnerable. By advancing detection technologies, improving filtration standards, and refining public health strategies, we can build a more resilient and health-conscious approach to air quality in the 21st century.
It’s time to stop overlooking what we can’t easily see.
Sources:
https://issuu.com/indamedia/docs/international_filtration_news_issue_2f9d5cd56618cf/s/71091993
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/12/1729
Tatama Air Cleaner
For commercial new construction or retrofits into existing facilities
Tatama uses Metalmark’s advanced HEPA-grade filters to capture airborne particulates, smoke, VOCs, and pathogens, including viruses and bacteria.
Sierra Air Filters
For your existing commercial HVAC systems
The HVAC filter with enhanced protection against wildfire smoke. A simple drop-in replacement with no change to air flow or pressure.
